official who has reviewed intelligence findings on RussiaвЂ™s cyber operations. вЂњThere are a variety of different exhibits that make the case, different factors that have provided the intelligence community with high confidenceвЂќ that Russia sought in part to help elect Trump, said a second senior U.S. officials declined to say whether the intercepted communications were cited in the classified version of the report commissioned by Obama, and they emphasized that although the messages were seen as strong indicators of MoscowвЂ™s intent and clear preference for Trump, they were not regarded as conclusive evidence of Russian intelligence agenciesвЂ™ efforts to achieve that outcome. 8 and they also felt pretty good about what they did,вЂќ a senior U.S. вЂњThe Russians felt pretty good about what happened on Nov. Given the president-electвЂ™s skepticism about the intelligence community - particularly its conclusions about Russia - the Trump Tower briefing has taken on the tenor of a showdown between the president-elect and the intelligence agencies he has disparaged. (Bastien Inzaurralde/The Washington Post) The classified document, which officials said is over 50 pages, was delivered to President Obama on Thursday, and it is expected to be presented to Trump in New York on Friday by the nationвЂ™s top spy officials, including Director of National Intelligence James R.

election systems over the past nine years. Those and other data points are at the heart of an unprecedented intelligence report being circulated in Washington this week that details the evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign and catalogues other cyber operations by Moscow against U.S. spy agencies include the identification of вЂњactorsвЂќ involved in delivering stolen Democratic emails to the WikiLeaks website, and disparities in the levels of effort Russian intelligence entities devoted to penetrating and exploiting sensitive information stored on Democratic and Republican campaign networks. Other key pieces of information gathered by U.S. intelligence communityвЂ™s assessment that MoscowвЂ™s efforts were aimed at least in part at helping Trump win the White House. officials believe had knowledge of the countryвЂ™s cyber campaign to interfere in the U.S. The ebullient reaction among high-ranking Russian officials - including some who U.S. officials who said that American intelligence agencies intercepted communications in the aftermath of the election in which Russian officials congratulated themselves on the outcome. Gloria Steinhem and Harry Belafonte are serving as honorary co-chairs of the event, and expected celebrity participants include Amy Schumer, Samantha Bee, Jessica Chastain and Olivia Wilde.Senior officials in the Russian government celebrated Donald TrumpвЂ™s victory over Hillary Clinton as a geopolitical win for Moscow, according to U.S. The protestВ is scheduled to take place on Jan. For many, a man who openly brags about sexually assaulting women does not belong in a position of power that allows him to establish (or revoke) laws pertaining to womenвЂ™s rights. The WomenвЂ™s March on Washington was organized in the days after TrumpвЂ™s win to protest the election of a candidate who has been widely accused of mistreating women and exhibiting misogynistic tendencies. And yet, so far,вЂќ wrote The CutвЂs Gabriella Paiella. Like how could they possibly have gotten it so wrong? And if any women were in the newsroom that let this happen?вЂќ вЂњSo given the story and the heavy use of pink, people had questions. вЂњJust to review, the traditional symbol for women isВ в™Ђ, notВ в™‚,вЂќ wrote Lauren Strapagiel. READ MORE: American women should be вЂvery worriedвЂ™ over Trump win: Halifax professor Although she did concede:В вЂњThe cover story that this terrifying image of ritualistically arranged severed limbs points to is actually really good.вЂќД«uzzFeed, which is known for comically illustrating their articles with gifs,В sympathized with the inevitable confusion the cover caused.

Washington post january 5 2017